The War Against Middle School Essay Topics

The War Against Middle School Essay Topics To compose a middle school essay outline step one is to recognize the sort of essay you will need to write. America lags behind many nations in education. The introduction will include a thesis statement. Write a narrative essay in which you describe the experience and the way that it made you feel. The process for writing a descriptive essay is quite simple and you ought to don't hesitate to try it upon your own. A timeless format for compositions is the five-paragraph essay it isn't the only format for writing an essay, naturally, but it's a handy model for you to keep in. All persuasive essays are like argumentative essays. In the event that you were given a task to compose an essay, you should first understand what sort of essay you're expected to write. You may write an article in a sort of a persuasive essay if you prefer to influence your readers to believe a specific notion. Before making up a last choice, think about the simple fact your essay is a bit of academic writing, which means it ought to be relevant and rather formal. People in demand of case study research should rush to delight in our assistance. Even in case you have excellent writing skills, you should read a lot as a way to develop your approach and improve specific areas of your writing. Moreover, in as much as you wish to work on any area of interest, it's very good to focus one which is related to your area. Limiting the range of a historical argument enables students to think deeply about the reason why they support a specific answer to the crucial question. Opt for the period of life which you think is best and compose an essay arguing why it's the very best time of life. Afterwards, you should explain the explanations for which you support that side. Additionally, local issues are terrific things to speak about, including events by local libraries and similar things like that. Now write to persuade your parents to buy you a mobile phone or maybe to enable you to keep the cell phone you presently have. Middle School Essay Topics Help! Imagine your school does not own a school newspaper. Additionally, school life is quite different. Think of what you could do in order to make your school more beautiful. Think of one thing you're expected to learn in school that you don't think ought to be included in the curriculum. Once you comprehend the form of essay, it's time to choose a topic. As an example, let's say you decide on the very first topic from our list. Actually a very good controversial topic is likely to make a persuasive essay top ic all more interesting. In addition, there are so many middle school essay topics that are below the technical subject field. Thanks to the correct option of presentation style and a thorough understanding of the goals you need to attain in your essay, there are many categories essay themes may be broken into. It is crucial to keep reading new stuff and essays from experts so you can enhance your understanding and vocabulary. Some hobbies are merely diversions. One of the very first things to think about is what sort of essay you will write. There are a lot of intriguing topics that could be become a persuasive essay if you take the opportunity to consider about doing it. 1 great benefit is that there are lots of topics and questions to be tackled. Directions for Writing Before you start writing, consider which is your favourite holiday and why. The third thing you ought to keep in mind while you pick a theme for your paper is that you want to choose a theme that you may actually research. If you succeed in picking a valid and intriguing topic for your assignment then the remainder of the procedure will be easier. The foundation of your paper is contingent upon the topic. The second thing which you need to not forget when you're attempting to opt for a superior theme for your middle school paper is to settle on a theme which truly interests you. When you're writing an academic paper it's important that you have a great introduction. It is crucial to remember that different kinds of essays need different style and approach. Therefore, if you're granted the chance by your instructor to compose an essay on a subject, which is free selection of your choice, don't forget to think about the possibilities as being endless. In addition, should you decide on a theme that interests you, the standard of your work will most likely be better, too.

The Social Responsibility Of Business - 1042 Words

Corporate Social Responsibility is defined as a business preparation that involves participating in creativities that help society. Friedman: The Social Responsibility of Business is to increase its profits. Milton Friedman argues that the only social responsibility a business has is to itself – mainly to its profits, and therefore, its stakeholders. The business management in charge of a company works for the organization and eventually for the stakeholders. This person is responsible for carrying out the commands that the stakeholders think important to the company reaching its goals. He feels that as long as business management brings out these needs in a way that follows the laws and ethical customs of society, this person has achieved their duty for society. He opposes that it is the duty of individuals, the administration, or different groups that are willingly made to take care of the needs of society. Business officials are charged with earning and spending corporate money. They symbolize the company and make choices for the benefit of the company. They know what it takes to create and sell the company’s product or service. If an administrative chooses a plan of social responsibility that is in conflicts with the company’s agenda of success, in Friedman’s opinion, this is a difference from the company’s goals and should cause the executive to be fired. Friedman does not believe a company executive with specific knowledge in their industry has the capability toShow MoreRelatedThe Social Responsibility Of Business932 Words   |  4 PagesA corporation does do business within a vacuum; rather exist as part of larger collective framework of society, stakeholders and a global business community. I believe that corporations which are profitable, and promote moral and ethical standards are the benchmark of success; additionally, corporations bear a great social responsibility to the society it exists within, an simply work ing within â€Å"the basic rules of society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom† is not enoughRead MoreBusiness and Social Responsibility1140 Words   |  5 PagesWhen a business gets incorporated regardless of the business size and the nature of profession requires an adequate execution methods for being successful and to achieve its goals. Some of these goals can be short-term or long-term, depends on the nature of business. Likewise, these execution methodologies can be vary time to time as the corporate needs to satisfy different groups of people such as : top hierarchy stakeholders, staffs ,shareholders, and even non-related business groups such as environmentalistsRead MoreThe Social Responsibility Of Business1422 Words   |  6 Pagesthe business be held accountable for these actions? In his essay â€Å"The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profit† Milton Friedman, powerful economist, discusses what a business sh ould prioritize in the economic system. Friedman declares what a business is responsible for and the guidelines they must follow. Due to Friedman’s view, he would not have condoned the actions and decisions that the executives at Ford Motor Company took. Friedman argues that the only responsibility a businessRead MoreThe Social Responsibility of a Business647 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿The Social Responsibility of Business: The role of business in the society became a major aspect across business after Milton Freedman wrote the most provocative article in 1970. As an economist, Freedman stated that the main purpose of businesses is to generate profits for its shareholders. Furthermore, he argued that companies with responsible attitudes were likely to encounter increased binding constraints unlike those that lacked these attitudes, resulting in them becoming less competitiveRead MoreThe Social Responsibility Of Business787 Words   |  4 Pages The economist and Nobel laureate Milton Friedman’s article published in The New York Times Magazine in 1970 titled, â€Å"The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.† (NYTimes, 1970) set tone for companies all across the country and all over the world. Companies start to turn in profits that shattered all charts and stock markets. Beginning in 1960s to 1990s, Capitalism had won the cold war with its arch rival the Soviet Union had withered away into the oblivion and the companiesRead MoreThe Social Responsibility Of Business1437 Words   |  6 Pagesthe business be held accountable for these actions? In his essay â€Å"The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profit† Milton Friedman, powerful economist, discusses what a business should prioritize in the economic system. Friedman declares what a business is responsible for and the guidelines they must follow. Due to Friedman’s view, he would not have condoned the actio ns and decisions that the executives at Ford Motor Company took. Friedman argues that the only responsibility a businessRead MoreThe Social Responsibility Of Business2053 Words   |  9 Pagesevolution-taking place; now the level of a business social responsibility has become increasingly integrated into modern business practices. This focus has seen both advantages and disadvantages to the business. However, to what extent has the use of the greater focus of a business social responsibility affected its competitive advantage in its marketplace. CSR is described as; â€Å"the principle that companies can and should make a positive contribution to society, of managing the social, environmental and economicRead MoreSocial Responsibility Of A Business1444 Words   |  6 Pagesareas of business and nonprofit management. However, Cohen’s article on social responsibility drew a lot attention from other scholars like Friedman. In view of this, this paper will discuss and define the concept of social responsibility of a business to its workers, stakeholders, and society; how the perspectives align with that of Drucker; comparing Cohen’s opinion with that of Friedman and finally determines which of the two individual’s opinion best aligns with the current business climate promotingRead MoreThe Social Responsibility Of Business Essay1959 Words   |  8 Pagesagree or disagree with the following quotation: â€Å"There is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage i n activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say engages in free and open competition, without deception and fraud.† Milton Friedman, a Nobel Prize winning economist. In other words, the social responsibility of business is to make a profit. I do not agree with the following quote by Milton FriedmanRead MoreThe Social Responsibility Of Business1463 Words   |  6 PagesIn his paper titled The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits†, Milton Friedman addresses the key issue of weighing social responsibility against profit maximization for shareholders. This conflict is the basis for Friedman’s whole paper, as he explores the two sides of the situation. In order to set up his argument, Friedman lays down a framework by explicitly stating a certain premise. This is that businessman view â€Å"social responsibility† and profit as not being mutually

SocietyS Impact Pertaining To Juveniles And Death Penalty.

Society s Impact Pertaining to Juveniles and Death Penalty The juvenile death penalty and in turn the death penalty are a much-debated topic. Society has conflicting views on the two topics, and these views have impacted the laws concerning the death penalty and juvenile death penalty. Eventually, societal views have made changes to both issues over time. The Death Penalty The death penalty is â€Å"death as a punishment given by court of law for very serious crimes. It is also referred to as capital punishment† (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2017). In other words, if a person commits a crime that their government, State and/or Federal, considers a capital offence then that person is susceptible to receive a death sentence as punishment for†¦show more content†¦Only one signer of the Declaration of Independence, Benjamin Rush, opposed the death penalty† (ProCon, 2013). On April 30, 1790, the Congress established Federal Death Penalty, and then on June 25, 1790 Thomas Bird was the first federal execution (ProCon, 2013). â€Å"Starting around 1833, public executions were attacked as cruel. Many states enacted laws providing private hangings. Rhode Island (1833), Pennsylvania (1834), New York (1835), Massachusetts (1835), and New Jersey (1835) all abolished public hangings† (ProCon, 2013). In the 1880s Thomas Edison building electrical lighting systems in U.S. cities, and to demonstrate its power he would electrocute animals. This led to people wanting to use electrocution as an execution method. Then on August 6, 1890, an electric chair was used for the first time on the murderer William Kemmler in the state of New York. Then, on February 8, 1924 the first person to be executed by cyanide gas via a gas chamber was Gee Jon, a Chinese gang member. (ProCon, 2013) (Clark, 2017). From 1967 to 1972 there was a voluntary moratorium (ban or halt) because public opinion turned against the death penalty. Legal authorities were questioning whether executions were against the Eighth Amendment for cruel and unusual punishment. Public support for the death penalty fell to its lowest point where only 42% of Americans approved of the death penalty. This halt of the deathShow MoreRelatedEssay Juvenile Delinquency5272 Words   |  22 PagesJuvenile Delinquency Amy Cowan CRJ 422 Prof. Angela Hermosillo November 15, 2010 Juvenile Delinquency Introduction Can we as a society truly reduce the rate of juvenile crime and violence? â€Å"Throughout all time there has been delinquency. It may not have had the delinquency label, but it still existed. Juvenile crime is mentioned as far back as ancient Sumeria and Hammurabi, where laws concerning juvenile offenders first appear in writtenRead MoreJuvenile Crime Issues in Today’s Criminal Justice System18893 Words   |  76 Pagesrights that may be threatened by technological advances and other developments:  ©  ©  ©  © chapter 15 Juvenile Justice chapter 16 Drugs and Crime chapter 17 Terrorism and Multinational Criminal Justice chapter 18 The Future of Criminal Justice These individual rights must be effectively balanced against these present and emerging community concerns: Widespread drug abuse among youth The threat of juvenile crime Urban gang violence High-technology, computer, and Internet crime (cybercrime) TerrorismRead MoreProvincial Jail10855 Words   |  44 PagesARCHITECTURE APPLICATION 32 5.1 Project profile and analysis 32 5.1.1 Description of the project 32 5.1.2 Project Rationale 33 5.1.3 Project Practicability 33 5.2 Site profile and analysis 34 5.2.1 Description of site 34 5.2.2 Laws and ordinances pertaining to the site 36 5.2.3 Bureau of Jail Management and Penology: Manual on Habitat: Space and Quarters, Water and Sanitation and Hygiene 37 5.3 Site analysis 38 6 DEFINATION OF TERMS 41 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY 42 8 APPENDIX 44 8.1 Details of Provincial JailRead MoreEpekto Ng Polusyon19213 Words   |  77 Pageswith domestic violence and the judgements that society imposes upon victims. This research also provides an evaluation of one of the existing support services designed to educate women about the reality of domestic violence and abuse and outlines the impact and effects of that which is taught upon the lives of those taking part. Introduction There are certain differences in the terminology and language used to explain and define domestic violence. This is often attributable to the way inRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesunderstand its distinctive learner-focused features especially the five-step learning model: Skill Assessment, Skill Learning, Skill Analysis, Skill Practice, and Skill Application. You’ll also find informative research on how much managers’ actions impact individual and organizational performance, and the characteristics of effective managers. †¢ Thoughtfully complete the Skill Assessment surveys in each chapter. These diagnostic tools are designed to help you identify which specific aspects of each

Law of Business Organizations for Morton and Eric- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theLaw of Business Organizations for Morton and Eric. Answer: This particular question is related to the breach of director duties which relates to the duty of directors to use the information of the company for proper purpose, particularly the information which they have obtained by holding a key position in the company in a manner which is detrimental for the company or where an advantage if attained for themselves or for someone else, under the general law and as per the statutory law of Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth), specifically its section 183. Under section 182 of this act, a similar prohibition has been placed on the misuse of position held by the director. This question is also related to the breach of director duties which relates to the duty of directors to act in good faith, for proper purpose and in the best interest of the company under the general law and as per the statutory law of Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth), specifically its section 181.The main issues of this case relates to the breach of director duties by Morton and Eric. As the non-executive directors of the company, it was the duty of both these directors to work towards the benefit of the company. It was the duty of Eric to disclose that there was a conflict of interest and not to misuse the information and position which he had by being a non-executive director of GoldCoin Bank Ltd. In ASIC v Stephen William Vizard[2005] FCA 1037, Vizard dealt with the companys shares and obtained a personal advantage for himself as he used the confidential information of Telstra which he had gained by holding the position of director in it. As a result of this, a penalty of $390,000 was imposed on him and he was also disqualified from managing the affairs of the company for ten years. It is very clear in this case that Eric misused the information which he got by holding the position of non-executive director in the company. He used his position to persuade the other directors to get the deal signed with Tricky Partners. By doing so, he caused detriment to the co mpany and gained advantage for himself thereby breaching his director duties under the general law and the one under the statutory law. Based on the quoted case, he could be disqualified and penalised. He had to disclose material personal interest per section 191-195, which was again not done. When it comes to Eric, it was his duty to act in the best interest of the company. When he was aware of, or had suspicion about the conduct of Morton, he should have gone to the board and raised this issue. It was his duty to work in the best interest, which he failed to do. By skipping the meeting, he further breached his director duties. On this basis, it can be concluded that there had been indeed breach of director duties on part of Morton and Eric. This particular question is related to the breach of director duties which relates to the duty of good faith and avoiding conflict of interest, apart from not misusing the crucial information of the company based on the general law and under section 181 and 183 of the CA. Apart from this, the question also has the traits of oppressive conduct on part of the three directors against Oistrakh. The key issue of this case relates to the misuse of position in the company and conflict of interest on part of three directors of the company and regarding the oppressive conduct by the three directors. Section 232 of CA gives the option to the minority shareholders of the company to apply for relief before the court where the conduct of the directors can be deemed as oppressive, discriminatory, or prejudicial. And the remedies can be claimed under section 233 of this act where the order can be made by the court which includes remedies like winding up the company, modification of constitution, appointing a receiver, and the like. In Hillam v Ample Source International Ltd (No. 2) (2012) FCAFC 73 it was held that the conduct of the board was oppressive toward the minority shareholders, as a result of which, the company had to be wound up and the sale proceedings to be distributed. The given case study shows that a conflict of interest was not avoided by the three directors in addition to the misuse of information of the company, resulting in breaches of section 181 and 183. This meant that a breach of director duties did take place for Oistrakhs colleagues. The conduct of the three directors was oppressive towards Oistrakh as he was a minority shareholder who was sidelined in the meetings and not informed about the key projects of the company. As a result of this, Oistrakh can apply for section 233 remedies. He can get the company to be wound up owing to this breach of director duties towards the shareholder and also as they had misused the information of the company to gain personal advantage, in addition to not working in the best interest of the company. Thus, the three directors breached their duties for which Oistrakh can apply for remedies particularly based on the quoted case. On this basis, it can be concluded that there had been indeed breach of director duties on part of Oistrakhs colleagues owing to the oppressive conduct. This particular question is related to the breach of director duties which relates to the duty of the directors to not involve in any such activities which can result in the company being insolvent or undertake any transaction when the company is already insolvent based on the common law and section 588G of the CA. The key issue of this case relates to the possible breach of the quoted section by Hawker under the general or statutory law. For successful application of this section, there is a need to show that the person had been a director when the debt was incurred by the company; that the company was already insolvent or became insolvent after incurring these debts; and had reasonable grounds for suspecting the insolvency of the company. As per Woodgate v Davis (2002) 55 NSWLR 222, this duty is meant to protect the welfare of the companys stakeholders. Metropolitan Fire Systems Pty Ltd v Miller (1997) 23 ACSR 699 provided that expectation of solvency has to be showed beyond mere hopes and there have to be grounds to prove that company had been solvent at that time, in order for the defence under section 588H to apply. In the given case, Hawker had the doubt that the company might be put under administration by the 50% shareholder of AvantGarde. And to safeguard her reputation, she indulged in a conduct which breached her director duties mentioned in the previous segments. She failed to act in best interest of Comet and just wanted to protect her own image. This was a breach of her director duties under section 181 as she failed to work in the best interest of the company. Also, this breached the general law duty as she gave supremacy to her interests before the company. Apart from this, the director duty covered under section 588G can also be claimed to have been breached here. She embezzled the funds which led to the insolvency of the company, as the same was coupled with the other fiasco. The shortfalls created in cash reserve are indicator of the company going in financial crunch. However, for this breach, Hawker can claim defence under section 588H where she can show that she expected solvency. And this can be based on different proofs which she would have to present. She can also show that had the other fiasco not taken place, the company would have been solvent. So, the liabilities under section 588G may or may not apply, and would depend upon the material presented by Hawkes. The duties owed towards AvantGarde were also breached as Hawkes was a director there and misused the position in the company and the information of AvantGarde and used it to her benefit in form of embezzling funds. So, her duties were also breached towards the other company. To conclude from the facts given, it is clear that Hawkes, by embezzling funds, breached the director duty of good faith towards both the companies. And there is also a chance of raising a case of breach of duty under section 588G, which may or may not be successful. This particular question is related to the breach of director duties which relates to the duty of applying care and diligence while the duties are being discharged and the powers are being used based on the general law and under section 180 of the Corporations Act, 2001. The key issue of this case relates to the breach of director duties by the COO of the company, along with the possible defences which can be used by him in this regard. The duty which is owed by the directors towards the company has to be discharged in a careful and diligent manner. ASIC v Healey (2011) 83 ACSR 484 provides that each member of the board has a responsibility and the same cannot be delegated to others. When it comes to the directors holding special skills, there is a need to show a standard by such person who professes to have the particular skill. For instance, ASIC v Vines (2003) 48 ACSR 322 saw Vines being appointed for his special skill and when the same was not properly done, he was held liable. Applying these rules to the case of COO, he was a person who had special skills in terms of being the operating officer. So, he had to be a specialist in the operations work. He had separate responsibility which cannot be fulfilled through delegation. So, when the report was prepared by the people appointed by him, he had the duty to check for the same. This is particularly because the duty of preparing the report was given to him by the board, which he had delegated. And as the report proved wrong, he would be deemed to have breached his director duties under section 180 owing to his special skill set. Here, he can cite the defence under section 198D that he had delegated the duty. However, there is a need to highlight that the duty can be delegated but not the responsibility. His defence would be successfully only when he can show that he was at all times fulfilling the duties imposed on him and reasonably believed on the report after making relevant inquiries. However, this defence would fail owing to his special skill knowledge and nothing to show that he properly checked the report. There is nothing in the case study to show that he was reliable or competent when he delegated his duty to new graduates who lacked the relevant experience and thus required to be supervised. Key information had been negligently omitted, which was his duty to ensure that the report had. On this basis, it can be concluded that there had been indeed breach of director duties on part of COO and the defences would not be able to help him owing to his special knowledge. This particular question is related to the breach of director duties which relates to the duty of applying care and diligence while the duties are being discharged and the powers are being used based on the general law and under section 180 of the Corporations Act, 2001 and the defence available under section 189. The key issue of this case relates to the breach of director duties by the directors of the company, along with the possible defences which can be used by them in this regard. Section 189 provides a leading defence to the directors when they rely upon the information which is provided by others. When reliance is made on report presented by person who is an expert, where the directors have reasons to believe that the given information is correct, than the directors cannot be blamed for a breach of their duties, owing to reliance made on good faith and reasonable reliance of the directors. Reliance has to be shown to having being made in good faith and only after making independent assessment. And till the time something contrary can be proved, the reliance is deemed to be reasonable. In this regard, there is a need to apply the case of AWA v Daniels (1992) 9 ACSR 383 which provides that a standard of care has to be applied by the directors as would be done by a reasonable person while doing their job and that there was no uniform standard for all directors. Undertaking the investment after relying upon the report presented by the COO of the company, the company had to bear major loss. In this regard, the board can cite the defence that they relied on the information presented by the COO as a defence and be discharged from the liabilities arising from not being careful or diligent. AWA v Daniels shows that each director has to follow different standard. And so, the petroleum engineer and the geology expert directors would not have uniform liabilities, as was for other directors. This is particularly as these two directors held special knowledge, which had to be applied to analyse the report. Thus, these two directors would be liable. This is particularly because the shortfalls of the report would be obvious to a geologist or engineer who was reasonably competent. On these bases, it can be concluded that save for two directors, all the directors would be deemed to have fulfilled their director duties; but the geology expert and petroleum engineer directors would be deemed to have contravened section 180. This particular question is related to the breach of director duties which relates to the duty of the directors to not involve in any such activities which can result in the company being insolvent or undertake any transaction when the company is already insolvent based on section 588G of the CA. The question also focuses on the possible defences available with the directors. The key issue of this case relates to the possible breach of the quoted section by the directors under the statutory law. As has been touched upon earlier, it is the duty of the directors to not indulge in such activities where the company becomes insolvent. The defences from the liability under this section are available under section 588H, where the directors have to show that they have reasons to believe that the company would be solvent after undertaking the particular transaction. Applying these sections to the case study, it would be deemed that the directors of ShaleRock had contravened their director duties as they allowed the company to continue running their operations even when the company was about to become insolvent. Instead of working on improving the position of the company, they chose to ignore the advice of CFO where it was clearly shown that the company was at a risk of insolvency and that there was a need to minimize the losses. The transfer of company funds to joint venture, which had been advised against by the executive chairman of the company was still undertaken. So, the company was already facing insolvency, the directors were aware of it and yet they incurred further debts for the company, which means section 588 was contravened. The defence under section 588H would not be helpful as the directors had no grounds to believe on the solvency of the company. The funds were transferred when the CFO had informed the board about potential insolvent condition and when the executive chairman had advised against it. This means that the directors of ShaleRock failed in discharging their director duties properly and led to the companys insolvent position. The executive chairman though can be safeguarded from the liabilities under section 588H as he had advised the board against such step and also, as he was not available at the meeting owing to health issues. However, even this defence of the executive director would fail based on Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clark (2003) 21 ACLC 1,063 as the health issue was more of cosmetic grounds instead of life threatening issue, as this was lack of good reason. On these bases, it can be concluded that the directors of ShaleRock would be deemed to have contravened their director duties as they transferred the funds of the company when the company was already facing insolvency, thus breaching section 588G and the defence under section 588H would not help them.